Resident/Fellow Research Day
2006
Diurnal Fluctuation and Concordance of Intraocular Pressure
in Glaucoma Suspects and
Normal Tension
Glaucoma Patients
L.M.
Shuba, MD, PhD
M.K.
Maley, MD, M.B. Zimmerman, PhD, A.P. Doan, MD, PhD, R.B.
Dinn, MD,
E.C. Greenlee, MD, W.L.M. Alward, MD, Y.H. Kwon, MD,
PhD, sponsors
Purpose: The one-eye drug trial for intraocular
pressure (IOP) lowering medications assumes the concordant fluctuation of the
IOP between the fellow eyes. Our objective was to determine the diurnal
variation and concordance of IOP in glaucoma suspects (GS) and normal tension
glaucoma (NTG) patients.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed on GS
and NTG patients with diurnal curves performed at
the University
of Iowa
. No subject had IOP greater than 21 mmHg. We
defined GS patients as having suspicious optic nerves (ON) with normal visual
fields (VF), and NTG patients as having glaucomatous ON with associated VF
loss. Subjects were excluded with:
glaucoma surgery, trauma, use of anti-glaucoma or steroid medications, uveitis
or secondary glaucoma. The IOPs were measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 10:00, 13:00, 16:00, 19:00, 22:00 and 07:00.
The linear association of OD and OS IOP over the 6 time points was estimated
using the average Pearson correlation coefficient (r). Linear mixed model analysis for repeated
measures, with Eye and Time as the within subject fixed effects, was used to
test if the mean change in the IOP over time differs between OD and OS. For the
analysis of concordance, the diurnal period was divided into seven time
intervals of 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21 hours and the absolute difference in change in IOP between
fellow eyes and probability that it was within 3 mm Hg were calculated.
Results: Sixty eight GS subjects (29 males and 39
females; age 56.8±18.5 (SD),
range 12-86 years) and 95 NTG subjects (32 males and 63 females; age 62.2±14.9 (SD), range 27-89 years) were
included in the study. In GS subjects, the pooled mean IOP was 14.9 mmHg with
the inter-eye SD of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.4, 1.6) and coefficient of variation (CV) of
9.7% (95% CI: 9.1, 10.4). In NTG
subjects, the pooled mean IOP was 15.5 mmHg with the inter-eye SD of 1.3 (95%
CI: 1.2, 1.4) and CV 8.3% (95% CI: 7.8, 8.8). The average correlation of OD and
OS IOP over the six time points was r=0.8 (95% CI: 0.7, 0.8) for GS, and r=0.8
(95% CI: 0.8, 0.8) for NTG subjects. The
mean absolute difference in IOP change between OD and OS over the six time
intervals ranged between 1.4 and 1.9 mmHg for GS, and 1.3 and 1.5 mmHg for NTG
subjects. The probability that this
difference was within 3 mmHg ranged
between 87% and 94% for GS, and 86% and 93% for NTG subjects.
Conclusions: We observed high correlation and
similarity of the mean IOP diurnal curves of fellow eyes in GS and NTG
subjects. The current results show that the diurnal variation in IOP between
the fellow eyes is mostly concordant within the limits of measurement
variability in GS and NTG patients. Assuming no cross-over effect, we conclude
that the one-eye therapeutic trial should help determine the effectiveness of a
topical agent in approximately 90% of the time in GS and NTG patients.
Support: Residents and Fellows Research Program,
Research to Prevent Blindness, Lew Wasserman Award,
McLaughlin Fellowship.
|