Central
Retinal Vein Occlusion
Natural History of CRVO
For proper management of a disease, understanding the natural history
of the disease is absolutely essential, so that the natural history
may not be interpreted as a beneficial effect of the treatment being
advocated. I have discussed elsewhere the following aspects of natural
history of CRVO.6
- Visual outcome: There is little definite information on
the natural history of visual outcome in CRVO in the literature. The available
information is based mostly on studies with either poor differentiation of
ischemic from non-ischemic CRVO or none at all, most of them retrospective.7,8,9
For example, the Multicenter CRVO study7
reported that initial acuity largely determines the visual acuity outcome,
but in that study CRVO was not differentiated into the two types. This invalidates
the findings, because it is like mixing apples and oranges.
In 1984, I analyzed the final visual acuity in 144 consecutive non-ischemic
CRVO eyes with completely resolved retinopathy who were followed in my clinic
up till 1984. Table 2 gives the final visual acuity achieved in these 144 eyes.
There was a significant improvement of visual acuity, spontaneously, in eyes
with initial visual acuity of 20/200 or better.
Table 2: Final visual acuity after resolution of
retinopathy in my natural history study10
| Visual acuity |
Non-ischemic CRVO |
|
| 20/15 to 20/40 |
65% |
| 20/50 to 20/80 |
9% |
| 20/100 to 20/200 |
11% |
| 20/400 |
8% |
| CF or worse* |
7% |
|
| Total eyes |
144 |
|
* = Main cause of poor vision
other than retinopathy, e.g., cataract, macular degeneration, glaucoma,
etc. |
CF = Counting fingers |
- Ocular NV: As mentioned above, non-ischemic CRVO
eyes do not develop NV unless there is associated disease that can
cause NV, e.g., diabetes mellitus or ocular ischemia5.
In ischemic CRVO:
- the risk of developing anterior segment NV exists mainly during the
first 7-8 months of the disease,
- the maximum risk of developing NVG is about 45%, and
- current conventional wisdom is wrong in assuming that all eyes with
iris or angle NV go on to develop NVG; 1/3
of eyes with iris NV and ¼ of eyes with iris and angle NV do not
progress to develop NVG on follow-up (Fig. 15).
These three facts of the natural history of ocular NV in ischemic CRVO
are of great clinical importance in its management.
- Cumulative chances of conversion of non-ischemic CRVO to ischemic
CRVO during follow-up: In our series of 500 eyes with non-ischemic
CRVO, from the time of onset of non-ischemic CRVO, this happened within 6
months in 9.4% and reached almost its maximum within 18 months in 12.6%.3
- Resolution of retinopathy: In both types of CRVO, the retinopathy
spontaneously resolves after a variable period. There is marked inter-individual
variation in the time it takes to resolve - usually faster in younger than
older people. Thus, both types of CRVO are self-limiting diseases,
although during the period of activity they may produce various complications.
|